1. If judges are no better than average at assessing the truthfulness of witnesses, what are the implications for the interpretation of contracts in which the parties’ testimony conflicts and there is no independence evidence?

1.   If judges are no better than average at assessing the truthfulness of witnesses, what are the implications for the interpretation of contracts in which the parties’ testimony conflicts and there is no independence evidence?

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount