I am attaching a case description which is based on written summary along with summary to be criticized files. Criticize the summary stated as “summary to be criticized”.
Content of critique. Read the (a) case, (b) theory section related to the case, and (c) the group’s summary. Type up your critique focusing only on what was incomplete or missing in the summary posting. – i.e., answer the following questions.
- Which case facts were missing in the summary? Why are those facts important – i.e. which theory aspect would the facts help illustrate?
- Alternatively, which theory aspects were not addressed in the summary although facts were given in the case. What are those facts?